I have always been fascinated with the stars and space. I enjoyed learning about astronomy in school and in Boy scouts. As I got older, I began to wonder if there truly is life on other planets. And why not? Why should we believe that we are the only ones who inhabit the universe? Would it shake our foundation set in religion? Would it be so preposterous to think that God created untold civilizations in the cosmos outside our own? Who are we to say what is fact and what isn’t? Especially when there is historical and archeological evidence to support the fact that we have been visited and helped in the past by advanced civilizations from beyond our place in the solar system. Could it be that the angels, gods, and demons mentioned in the Bible and every other doctrine and text, were in fact our cosmic cousins? Take some deep thoughts. Look into the night sky and understand that the stars we see represent, planets, suns, nebula, and whole galaxies! And you still think that God just created us?

We are not alone, and have never been alone. That is my opinion. As Werner Von Braun said when asked about the incredible technology possessed by the Germans during WW2, “We had help from them”.

Please, let me know your thoughts. I find this to be one of the most interesting topics and quite frankly the most important story in human history.

In the book of Luke, chapter 17 verse 21, Yeshua said “The kingdom of God is within you”. This is also mentioned elsewhere in the Bible and in the Gospel of Thomas, which is known to be a “Gnostic” Gospel. Which, to me, if it is found in not only the Bible, but in texts outside the Bible, that leads to it’s credibility. And it is an interesting and powerful statement that unfortunately I’ve never heard referenced before in church or in any discussion.

And in terms of salvation and the afterlife, you’d think that this verse would be a cornerstone for that topic. Well, it’s not. What is usually discussed, or preached, is salvation and that one must be saved in order to gain access to heaven. Well then the Bible contradicts itself. If we are to believe Yeshua’s word and message, then we must take into account what he said in three different texts. “The kingdom of God (Heaven) is within you”. What does that even mean? A spark of divinity? The soul? Our immortal being? It’s all the same. Could it be that our idea of death, of heaven and hell are skewed by traditions and set forth by church doctrine? This all goes back to my previous post on Traditions and Teachings. How much of what we read in the Bible is truth, and how much is tradition? Where does our understanding come from? Let me know your thoughts.

I grew up going to church, listening to the pastors and preachers who would stand behind the pulpit and preach the word of God. As I have stated in an earlier blog, I have always been fascinated by the Bible, and for that matter, all religion. But how much of it is tradition passed down from generation, to generation? And how much of it is actual truth? The answer may be that we may never truly know.

I do not believe the Bible to be “the word of God”. To me this seems pretty ridiculous. I DO believe that the Bible, like all books, is the word of man. I believe it has truth in it, but that the truth is skewed and distorted among religious dogma. I keep hearing certain scripture regurgitated time and again by various people, meanwhile leaving out other scripture, interestingly enough, the verses that make us scratch our heads and provoke our thoughts. It makes me wonder how much of the Bible many people have read. I myself am no scholar, and have not read the entire Bible front to back. But what I have read of the Bible, that is without the influence and pressure of a church official, I have found to be thought provoking and make me question life in general. Yet I never see these questions addressed in church, nor in any religious discussion. And whenever I have brought any of these questions to light, I always hear that it “God’s Will”, or the subject is changed to a matter of salvation.

Many don’t even seem to follow the teachings of Yeshua, but merely the traditions of man. Yeshua taught of love, peace, and harmony with our fellow man, much like Buddha coincidentally. Yet, look how many so-called Christians act. Many are arrogant and full of pride just because they belong to this congregation or that. Many go along with the political agenda of wars of aggression, and turn a blind eye when there is talk of torture at Gitmo. Yet they call themselves Christians? Christian means to be Christ-like. And I feel if one is truly to be a Christian, one must study and live by the teachings of Yeshua and stop following the traditions set by man and the established church.

The Bible, I feel, is a wonderful book. I don’t read it nearly as often as I should. But I do find it fascinating. When I was young, I was always attracted to the Old Testament stories. I particularly like the one about David and Goliath. As a kid, I was often picked on and ridiculed for whatever reason. So the story, the idea, that a smaller person could defeat a much larger person,even with minimal effort, was astonishing to me. And it still is. Another story I used to gobble up and enjoy reading was the story of Jericho. King Joshua, whom my parents named me after, marched his army around the city of Jericho and on the seventh day blew the ram’s horn and the walls of the city fell. Now I have heard this to be more metaphorical and have heard a military tactic explanation of this story, which may be true as well, but still fascinating.

But I have questions about the Bible, or at least man’s interpretation of these texts. First off, I am curious, why were so many books kept from being put into the Bible? And not only that, but they were banned from being read in the first place! Who made this decision? The church? Who are they to throw out certain books? Most Bibles contain 66 books (39 Old Testament and 27 New Testament). But did you know that the Bible of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church contains 81 books? Now there is a lot more information and history that I have yet to fully read. But it makes me wonder. Why does one Bible contain 66 and another 81? We are told that the Bible is the “Word of God”. Then why diminish his word by 15 books? Just a thought.

Secondly, preachers and pastors talk about the Rapture and that we will be accepted into the kingdom of God. I am no scholar not theologian but, I don’t think that’s what Jesus (Yeshua) said. The following is from the Gospel of Luke, chapter 17 verses 20-21:

20. And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God shall come, he answered them and said, “The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:

21. Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! For the kingdom of God is within you”

This is also mentioned in the lost Gospel of Thomas, which was discovered in 1945 and is said to have been written around the time of the original Gospels. It states in Chapter 1 verse 3: (Yeshua speaking)

“If those who lead you say unto you:Behold, the kingdom is in heaven, then the birds of the heaven will be before you. If they say it is in the sea, then the fish will be before you. But the kingdom is within you and is outside of you. When you know yourselves, then you shall be known, and you shall know that you are sons of the living father. But if ye do not know yourselves, then you are in poverty, and you are poverty.”

That was a bit to take in. But if Jesus was right, and I believe he was, and IS, then why do we expect the kingdom to come? Again just another thought.

I do not wish to insult, or offend anyone. I am just exploring thoughts that seem to come to me.

God Bless :)

In today’s society, modern medicine has grown by leaps and bounds.  We have gone from our ancestors ripping the heart out for a sacrifice, to replacing a heart to save a life. We have gone from amputations, due to infections, to creating artificial limbs.  And we once believed it to be impossible to allow a blind person to see again, and we now have wonderful interface technology that uses the power of the brain to bring back sight.

    Along with all these advancements we have come up with various drugs for various ailments.  We have prescription pills for almost everything from depression and insomnia, to arthritis and erectile dysfunction.  It seems, in today’s society, there is a pill for virtually everything.  And we as Americans are more than content with the pills that are given to us.  However, we seem to ignore the many risks involved in taking these various drugs.  Many of them, which primarily deal with depression, insomnia, and mental problems, have been shown to be linked to violence.  The side-effects listed in many of these drugs describe agitation, aggression, mood swings, and depression or thoughts of suicide.

    This, of course, is not to say that all prescription drugs are bad and should not be taken.  However, when we notice violent behavior, we tend to overlook the possibility of the side-effects of these drugs as being the cause.  Many Americans are quick to blame other factors such as; video games, music, illegal drugs, and peer influence as the cause of violent behavior.  And certainly these factors do play a part; however, prescription drugs are too often overlooked.

    There have been many stories of school shootings where the assailant(s) were shown to have taken prescription drugs, more specifically, antidepressants.  One such case was on March 21st 2005, a young man named Jeff Weise, who was 16, walked into his high school in Red Lake, Minnesota and proceeded to kill 7 of his schoolmates before turning the gun on himself.  This was after he had killed his grandfather and one other individual.  It was well known that he was on the prescription drug Prozac.  (BBC News).  Sadly this is not the first or only time such an incident has happened.  And this is not the only time that the drug Prozac was involved.

    In 2007, Seung-Hui Cho killed 32 people and wounded several others before turning the gun on himself.  This was the infamous shooting at Virginia Tech.  It was said that he suffered from an anxiety disorder.  For this, he was prescribed the antidepressant drug, Prozac.  It seemed quite clear, as the media reported on Cho’s supposed personality, that he had clear mental problems.  And since these problems did exist, would it make sense that he seek help and was prescribed medication?  Yet, this seemed to be a non-issue to the media.

    Another such incident was the famous Columbine Massacre that happened in Colorado in 1999.  On April 20th, 1999 two boys, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, killed 13 individuals at their high school.  One of the shooters, Eric Harris, was prescribed Luvox, which is an antidepressant.  However, although Harris had the prescription for the medication, autopsy later revealed that there was no evidence of the drug in his system at the time.  (CNN:  http://articles.cnn.com/1999-04-29/health/).  However, that is not to say that the prescription drug itself did not have a long-term effect on his psyche.  The media claimed that violent video games and music were the cause of the two boy’s violent acts.  There seems to be a pattern so far; a known fact that these in these cases, the shooter(s) were on prescription drugs, more specifically anti-depressants, thus the reason why many have suggested the link between prescription drugs and violent behavior.  Another pattern seems to that the media completely ignoring these possible links.  Could it be that the big pharmaceutical companies have some influence on our mainstream media outlets?  Have you noticed that when watching Fox news, CNN, or MSNBC that most of the television ads are prescription drug ads?  

    There are much more recent shootings that have led to the questioning of prescription drugs.  Such as the Ft. Hood shooting, where, the shooter himself was a psychiatrist and had access to these drugs.  However, in that case, the media blamed the incident on Muslim extremism.  Then there is the most recent shooting tragedy that happened in Tuscon, Arizona.  The shooter, Jared Lee Loughner, went on a shooting spree in a shopping center, killing 6 people.  However, there was no evidence of any prescription drug use, although he was known to use a drug called Salvia, which is legal in some states.

    In most, if not all these shootings, there seems to be a pattern; the shooters were given prescription drugs for having some sort of mental problem.  And in almost every case, it seems to be antidepressants and anxiety medication.  Now, certainly someone who has a serious mental problems, they should seek medical help.  But one only has to look at the side effects of these drugs to see the potential dangers within.

    When you watch a drug ad on television, have you noticed something?  The side-effects outweigh the benefits.  And in most cases, especially with the various antidepressants, anxiety, and insomnia medications, the most common side-effects are generally mood swings, worsening depression and thoughts of suicide.  It’s almost laughable to hear and read the information on these drugs.  And there are various articles and reports that list specific drugs to violent behavior.  One in particular lists the top ten prescription drugs that are linked to violence.  These drugs are as follows:

 

1.    Desvenlafaxine (Pristiq) – An antidepressant which affects serotonin and noradrenalin, this drug is 7.9 times more likely to be associated with violence than other drugs.

 

2.    Venafaxine (Effexor) -   A drug related to Pristiq in the same class of antidepressants, both are also used to treat anxiety disorders. Effexor is 8.3 times more likely than other drugs to be related to violent behavior.

 

3.    Fluvoxamine (Luvox)-  An antidepressant that affects serotonin (SSRI), Luvox is 8.4 times more likely than other medications to be linked with violence

 

4.    Triazolam (Halcion) – A benzodiazepine which can be addictive, used to treat insomnia. Halcion is 8.7 times more likely to be linked with violence than other drugs, according to the study.

 

5.    Atomoxetine (Strattera)-  Used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Strattera affects the neurotransmitter noradrenaline and is 9 times more likely to be linked with violence compared to the average medication.

 

6.    Mefoquine (Lariam) – A treatment for malaria, Lariam has long been linked with reports of bizarre behavior. It is 9.5 times more likely to be linked with violence than other drugs.

 

7.    Amphetamines (Various) – Amphetamines are used to treat ADHD and affect the brain’s dopamine and noradrenalin systems. They are 9.6 times more likely to be linked to violence, compared to other drugs.

 

8.    Paroxetine (Paxil) – An SSRI antidepressant, Paxil is also linked with more severe withdrawal symptoms and a greater risk of birth defects compared to other medications in that class. It is 10.3 times more likely to be linked with violence compared to other drugs.

 

9.    Fluoxetine (Prozac) – The first well-known SSRI antidepressant, Prozac is 10.9 times more likely to be linked with violence in comparison with other medications.

 

10.    Varenicline (Chantix) – The anti-smoking medication Chantix affects the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, which helps reduce craving for smoking. Unfortunately, it’s 18 times more likely to be linked with violence compared to other drugs — by comparison, that number for Xyban is 3.9 and just 1.9 for nicotine replacement. Because Chantix is slightly superior in terms of quit rates in comparison to other drugs, it shouldn’t necessarily be ruled out as an option for those trying to quit, however.

 

As the list shows, Chantix is 18 times more likely to be associated with violence that the other drugs.

Other drugs that are linked to violent behavior include Ambien, Lunesta, and Ritalin.  One may only need to look at the side-effects of these drugs to see the potential risks.  Ambien and Lunesta, for example, have been known to cause hallucinations, agitation, and aggression, changes in behavior, and depression and thoughts of suicide.  Ritalin has been known to cause anxiety, nervousness, insomnia, and in some cases, depression.  Those who have overdosed on Ritalin, or who have become extremely dependant on the drug have experienced the following:  Aggression, hallucinations, panic states, personality changes, symptoms of depression, and in chronic abuse, characteristics of schizophrenia are known.

    Many of these symptoms, match that of the many other prescription drugs that are available.  It’s as if we are being chemically altered in some way, to act out or behave in ways we normally wouldn’t, in order to be put on yet another mind altering drug.  All this is not to say that prescription medication is bad, but as we advance further into western medicine we must be cautious as to how these drugs are affecting us mentally and physically.  In the end, it seems that the big pharmaceutical companies are more interested in making money than actually curing diseases.  

    Furthermore, we must look into the link between the effects of these drugs and the violent behavior among those to whom they were prescribed.  If we were to accept that as a factor, than we could possibly we could prevent future tragedies from happening.  Imagine if we were able to stop the terrible shooting at Virginia Tech, or Columbine High, by collectively knowing that these have the potential to cause such violent behavior.  It’s certainly a nice thought, but we cannot turn back time.  What we can do, however, is begin to research the facts and demand answers.  In addition, we can begin to look into alternative treatments to the various health issues that the prescription drugs are supposed to treat.  For example:  Insomnia is usually treatedby taking AmbienCR or Lunesta, which can have adverse effects that lead to violence.  But what about Chamomile?  Or Lavender?  Both are common herbal supplements that are well known to help induce sleep and relaxation.  

    So instead of rushing to the pharmacy to pick up the latest mind-altering synthetic pill, we should be learning more about what causes the symptoms, and find a natural way to cope with them.  If we cannot come to terms with the obvious risks that these drugs present and how, in so many cases, lead to violent behavior, then we will slowly slip into a medicated oblivion.  And if we allow the big pharmaceutical companies to get by with presenting these drugs to the public, then what will they come up with next in the name of health?  Will the next add be for a Cyanide pill to cure cancer?  We as a culture are continuously loosing our humanity and poisoning ourselves in the name of health.

As I pull back the string of my Ben Pearson re-curve bow, I am reminded of the simple things in life.

Take the arrow for example. As it is released through the air the arrow does not fly in a straight line, nor does it remain rigid. I swims through the air! Like a fish in water or a snake on the desert sand, it leaves it’s trace in the invisible molecules that make up the air we breathe. It arcs across the sky, spinning and weaving. The feathers allow for short or long flights depending on their size. The arrow wisps through the air, guided by the flight and launched with careful aim by the archer. And within a short moment it drives into it’s intended target.

Moral of the story:

Be the Arrow! Glide through life swiftly and with purpose. Swim through life not in a straight and narrow line, but weaving and arcing over life’s troubles, but with a sure direction. Allow your path of flight to be long, but do not overshoot your target. And when you come to the place in life that you want to be, Hit the Bulls-eye!

Do you remember sitting in grammar school and learning how write in cursive? Remember listening to the teacher lecturing you about the proper size of your lettering? Well I know I do. However, our children today are not taught this important skill anymore. When it was once vital to learn proper penmanship, now has been completely thrown out of the public schools. Instead our children are being geared for the “technical world” of computers, cell phones, and the “digital age.” Now sure we are in a digital age where technology is a very huge part of our lives. But have we allowed it to consume us this much that we completely dismiss vital and proper teaching of writing and grammar? Not only do the schools throw out penmanship, but they no longer teach proper grammar, and punctuation. These kids are no longer taught the proper uses of commas, apostrophes or semi-colons in order to form a proper sentence. And we wonder why many of these kids cannot speak properly, or even write their name clearly.

Could it be that these kids focus more on “texting” rather than writing? I love it when I hear many people call themselves writers these days, and sure I do the same thing. But who truly writes anymore? We are “typers.” And the writing that many of us do seems to be a hinder and a burden. But what are our children going to do when they enter the real world and are required to use their signature when filling out a document? Your signature is an authentication of who you are. So what are they going to do since they are no longer taught this in school? Text?

I bet if you were given a child or teen a copy of the original Declaration of Independence, they would not be able to read it. I don’t even think that many of them would know what the Declaration of Independence is. Or, even if they were given a printed copy, they would not be able to understand what the words meant, since the vocabulary was actually far more advanced and sophisticated than it is today.

It is no doubt that we are in a technological age where computers and electronic devices are the norm. But we should not refuse to teach our children the vital and basic skills of this lost art of penmanship.

I frequently hear certain people talk about the planet being “overpopulated”. Mainly by the so-called environmental types who keep telling us that Carbon Dioxide, which is what humans exhale and plants breath in, is bad. But when you think about the term “overpopulation”, what comes to mind? That the planet itself is overpopulated with too many people and not enough resources? This absolutely ridiculous. If the planet were overpopulated, then there wouldn’t be any land or resources at all.

The truth is, the planet has plenty of room and resources to sustain our very small population of 7 billion. The problem is, who controls those resources? And there is overpopulation, but that is in concentrated cities. There is a difference. There are plenty of resources on this planet, as I mentioned earlier, one need only to look for them. We have the capability to explore untouched areas which can hold a vast array of possibilities! However, we as a society have become so lazy and dependent on government that we no longer think for ourselves.

And so whenever government or some corporate, or banker elitist, tells us that we should pay a carbon tax to “protect the environment”, we just do as we’re told without question.

Well here’s the dirty little secret that they don’t want you to know…. We have the power! We are the authority and they are the servants!

And I am mainly speaking for my fellow Americans who have the Constitution and Bill of Rights to follow as law, and that also protect us from the very tyranny we face.

And, as history clearly shows, it’s always the royal elite, and wealthy families that want to monopolize the resources and control the minds of the masses. And what’s even more scarier, they even want to control and reduce the population. Let me give you some information to back that one up:

First of all, let’s look at the Georgia Guidestones. The very first line at the top states “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000″

Also, there are direct quotes from several globalist people.

“A population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal” – Ted Turner, founder of CNN and UN supporter quoted in the McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June 1996.

There are many other quotes from various globalists, and eugenics supporters:

In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.” – Jacques Cousteau

“…The first task is population control at home. How do we go about it? Many of my colleagues feel that some sort of compulsory birth regulation would be necessary to achieve such control. One plan often mentioned involves the addition of temporary sterilants to water supplies or staple food. Doses of the antidote would be carefully rationed by the government to produce the desired population size.” – Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb, p.130-131

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” – Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund – quoted in “Are You Ready For Our New Age Future?,” Insiders Report, American Policy Center, December ’95
\ ’96

“Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.” – Sir Julian Huxley, first director general of UNESCO (1946-1948)

“In order to stabilize world population, it is necessary to eliminate 350,000 people a day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.”
- Oceanographer Jacques Cousteau, as quoted in the Courier, a publication of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)

“In China, I witnessed forced abortions and forced sterilizations performed on women who were told that the children they were carrying were ‘illegal’. I went with them when they were arrested and remained with them as they were subjected to mind-bending psychological torture. And I accompanied them as they went in tears to the local clinic to have their pregnancies aborted.”
- Steven W. Mosher

“Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
- David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club; founder of Friends of the Earth; and founder of the Earth Island Institute – quoted by Dixie Lee Ray, Trashing the Planet, (p.166)

“Forget sex and watch television to control the number of children you have. Our view is that you should only have the number of children you could support”
- Prime Minister Patrick Manning

“One-fourth of humanity must be eliminated from the social body. We are in charge of God’s selection process for planet Earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death.”
- Psychologist Barbara Marx Hubbard – member and futurist/strategist of Task Force Delta; a United States Army think tank

“The doctor finds that while he cannot save the life of a woman dying of a simple pneumonia because he does not have a vial of penicillin which costs only a few cents, he could if he so desired, fit her with as many IUDs as he liked in her death throes. An IUD costs many times the price of penicillin.”
- Dr. Margaret A. Ogola, Testimony on International Population Control Activities, 1994

All of these quotes and more are well documented and can be found at http://curezone.com/forums/

All one has to do is open their eyes and see what’s happening. These people want a world government that they can control. “The name of the game is control” – An excerpt from the novel “Facing the Shadows” by Joshua Miller.

So the next time you hear people preach about the world be overpopulated, beware. For, “Truth is stranger than fiction, and in fiction hides reality” – Joshua Miller, Author, Writer.

I hope you take the time and truly research these facts for yourself, and know that the truth is out there.

My name is Joshua Miller, I am just an ordinary guy who seeks the truth where ever it may be found, and disposes the lies that are forced on us by the government and media.  I am the author of a novel called “Facing the Shadows”, available online at Amazon.com, or xlibris.com in paperback or e-book form.  I am also the creator of this blog, which I intend to use as a platform to share and inform the people ideas and feelings and truth that I wish to share.  I hope that you all enjoy my blog, and feel free to comment on anything I say.   Thank you, and may we all find the truth together!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.